Tuesday, August 31, 2010

The Story Behind the Story: “The Good Thief’s Guide to Vegas,” by Chris Ewan

(Editor’s note: For this latest entry in The Rap Sheet’s “Story Behind the Story” series, we offer a hearty welcome to British novelist Chris Ewan, author of the highly touted Charlie Howard/“Good Thief” works, the latest of which is The Good Thief’s Guide to Vegas [Minotaur Books], the subject of his essay below.)

I didn’t know how I’d feel about Las Vegas. I’d spoken with plenty of people who’d visited, and their reactions were always extreme. Some people loved the place--for the neon, the noise, the outrageous luxury of the mega-casinos, the gluttony of the breakfast buffets, the glamour of the show spectaculars, the illicit sensation of gambling ... Others hated it--for the same reasons. I’d all but decided that I wanted my third “Good Thief” mystery to be set in Sin City, and my first visit was going to settle things for good.

It was New Year’s Eve 2007, soon to be 2008, and my fiancée and I were booked into the Luxor Hotel--a tinted-glass pyramid with a laser at its peak that’s powerful enough to give the Death Star weapon-envy. The shuttle bus ride from McCarran Airport had taken us to our lodgings via the MGM Grand Hotel, New York-New York, and the medieval Excalibur. During that journey, a British boy in the seat in front of us had clambered towards his window outside New York-New York, goggle-eyed at the giant roller coaster that coiled around the landmark skyscrapers, and announced that it looked like Disney World. He sounded excited. He wasn’t alone.

The first two “Good Thief’s Guides” were set in Amsterdam and Paris, respectively, and it had always been my hope to take Charlie Howard--mystery writer and hapless burglar--Stateside for book three in the series. In part, that was because of my long-held fascination with the USA--I took a degree in American Studies, and many of my favorite writers are American. But it also had to do with speed. I wanted everything in the third book to happen at pace. I wanted Charlie to get into trouble on vacation, when he was unfamiliar with his environment, and I wanted that trouble to be fast and extreme. Vegas struck me as both of those things, and more besides. Before I’d even checked into my room, I knew it was perfect for Charlie, even if it wasn’t ideal for me.

Three months later I was back, spending a clutch of nights at the Venetian as part of my honeymoon. By now, I was working on a plot, scouting for ideas. The first one came to me when we checked into our suite. I was putting our valuables inside our hotel room safe, and I happened to notice something unusual (at least to me). You could lock the safe by entering a four-digit code, but you could also lock it by swiping your credit card through a reader on the fascia of the safe. It struck me as pretty secure. Until I thought about it some more. Say my wallet got stolen. Say it contained the key card to my hotel room (along with the nifty cardboard sleeve that had originally contained my key, and that happened to list my room number). Well, wouldn’t that mean that someone could get inside my suite and try a bunch of my credit cards in the hope that one of them would open the safe?

A lot of the Vegas movies and novels I’d been enjoying as part of my research were about major casino heists--overblown crimes in an overblown place--and I started to think it would be interesting to invert that classic narrative by exploring a petty crime that spiraled out of control. So Charlie would steal a wallet at the beginning of the book, and from there he’d access a hotel room, and from there a safe ... But whose wallet should he steal? I needed a victim who wouldn’t generate too much sympathy. By now, we’d left our suite and were taking a walk through a nearby shopping mall. Inside the mall was a cramped theater--maybe not the type of place your average wannabe dreams of performing. A magic show was about to start. There were tickets available at a knock-down price (funny, that). My wife and I figured we’d kill an hour or two, and went inside. The show had been billed as comedy magic, and it was--except the parts that were meant to be funny, weren’t, and the parts that were meant to be thrilling were unintentionally hilarious. At one point, the magician beckoned a teenage boy up on stage as a volunteer for one of his tricks, but instead of being wowed, the boy saw the magician cheat. He called him on it in front of the entire audience. The kid refused the gifts being offered to him--a set of DVDs of the magician performing--unless the magician confessed to what he’d done. The magician refused, the kid was shuffled off stage by a leggy assistant, and the show stumbled on--but the episode stuck with me, and that bumbling magician grew into the character of Josh Masters, “star” magician at the Fifty-Fifty casino-hotel.

Not heard of the Fifty-Fifty? That’s because I made it up. I mentioned research, and I’d been reading a bunch of books about Las Vegas--its mob history, its spectacular growth and development, the infamous attempted thefts and (allegedly) successful gambling cons that had been visited upon it. All of it was fascinating, but one thing interested me in particular--the resort hotels themselves. From the daring gamble of the Flamingo, through the Rat Pack days of the Sands, to the family-themed Circus-Circus, and modern behemoths like the Mirage and Bellagio, right up to the recently opened City Center development. Each hotel resort had become more ambitious and more outlandish than the last, and I figured I’d have a go at constructing some casinos of my own--imaginary ones that I dropped onto the plots currently occupied by the Imperial Palace and Bally’s, and a square of vacant dirt next to the Mandalay Bay. So the Fifty-Fifty is based on the theme of 1950s America, with the casino floor dedicated to a noir world of cops and gangsters; Space Station One is a spaceship-themed hotel; and the Atlantis-Las Vegas is a hotel-water park on the skids. After all, in a world of hourly exploding volcanoes and scheduled pirate battles between scantily clad lingerie models, anything is feasible, right?

All of this thinking about hotels led to two things: one, the idea of creating a scenario where Charlie had to break into as many hotel rooms as he possibly could, and steal as much as he was able to, in a period of 24 hours; and two, an awareness that lurking behind some of the most notable hotels in Las Vegas have been some pretty notable property moguls with (whisper it) murky pasts. Maybe, I thought, one of these moguls could become a fitting adversary for Charlie?

Well, fine, but I mentioned that one of the things that had attracted me to Vegas were the extremes that could be found there. So I decided to create two hotel moguls--a pair of identical twins. And while I was at it I threw in a dead showgirl, a circus giant and a dwarf, and a private detective with a specialty in investigating gambling irregularities. I mean, small crimes are all well and good, but I couldn’t write a book about Sin City without a gambling con, and my research had taught me a couple of corkers. This was where Charlie’s literary agent and friend, Victoria Newbury, would come in, and where I could finally reveal a dark secret about her past. Oh, and then there was the Houdini angle to explore. In 2004, a collection of Houdini memorabilia had been auctioned off at the Liberace Museum on Vegas’ East Tropicana Avenue, and it occurred to me that Josh Masters might have been tempted to buy an item or two. More research beckoned.

So that was trip two, but I still had one visit left. This is the way I work with my “Good Thief” novels--three visits for each city I write about (a drag, I know). The final trip took place the following spring, when I was polishing the manuscript during a stay at the Bellagio. This time, I looked for details--ways to better conjure a sense of Vegas, perhaps by mentioning some of the tunes that accompany the dancing fountains out on Lake Bellagio, or the confetti of call-girl cards that litter the sidewalks between hotels. I visited the casino floor and got the knock-back from the hotel security team, who were curiously reluctant to discuss room thefts with me. I took a drive out to Mount Charleston, where people were snowboarding on the fringes of the desert, and a detour back through Naked City in the shadows of the Stratosphere Tower. I ate a meal in the ersatz St. Mark’s Square in the middle of the Venetian--where the final scene of my novel is set. I played rapid roulette and blackjack in Paris-Las Vegas, losing comprehensively. My wife won big(ish) on a giant fruit machine in the Mandalay Bay. I guzzled a champagne buffet, flew to the Grand Canyon, walked beneath the gaudy neon canopy above Fremont Street. And you know what? I became one of those hopeless fools who falls hard for Las Vegas. I’d return tomorrow in a heartbeat.

Seen to Be Done

Hard as this is to believe, The Bill--the longest-running police procedural series on British television (it debuted way back in 1984!)-- will finally go off the air after tonight’s episode.

“Bad” News Is Good News

It has finally come time to announce the winners of The Rap Sheet’s latest book giveaway contest. More than 80 people entered for a chance to pick up one of two free hardcover copies of Peter Robinson’s brand-new Alan Banks/Annie Cabbot novel, Bad Boy. This morning, a pair of names were chosen at random. Those winners are ...

Weng-Him Cheung of Longmeadow, Massachusetts
Grant LeFaive of Coquitlam, British Columbia, Canada

We offer our hearty congratulations to both readers. Publisher William Morrow should be sending out those free copies of Bad Boy right away.

And to everyone who wasn’t lucky enough to win this time, there’s no need for despair. The Rap Sheet should have more free books to give away in the very near future.

DeKok and the Lost Creator

Just two weeks shy of his 87th birthday, Dutch cop turned crime novelist Albert Cornelis “Appie” Baantjer died this last Sunday, August 29, in The Netherlands. He was the author of a long-running series featuring Amsterdam police inspector Jurriaan DeCock (aka DeKok) and his sidekick, Sergeant Vledder.

A report from Radio Netherlands Worldwide recalls that
For nearly four decades he wrote two books a year about police inspector Juriaan de Cock which sold millions of copies and were translated into numerous languages, including English, German, Polish, Korean and Chinese.

Appie Baantjer was himself an ex-policeman and worked for 28 years at the Warmoesstraat station in Amsterdam’s red-light district. Most of his books take place in that environment.

In the 1990s Dutch television started a series based on his books and entitled Baantjer, which ran for 12 years and significantly increased the size of his audience. The author himself was pleased with the TV version. “The way Piet Römer plays De Cock,” he said, “is exactly right."

After the death of his wife, Marretje, in 2007, Baantjer decided that the 70th De Cock book would be the last. However, he went on to work with co-authors on a new series about Hendrick Zijlstra, De Cock’s nephew.

Literary critics tended to dismiss Baantjer’s novels as “light reading” or worse, but he won several genre prizes and was at one time the best-selling Dutch author.
The first De Cock mystery translated into English was DeKok and Murder on the Menu (1992). Over the last few years, Speck Press has been busily reissuing the De Cock novels, with the latest of those releases being DeKok and the Corpse by Return.

(Hat tip to The Gumshoe Site.)

Monday, August 30, 2010

Call of the Wild

This makes four.

One of the great things about the four--yes, four--great crime films released in the United States this year is that they’re all different, while familiar at the same time. Winter’s Bone, which I reviewed in my last piece for The Rap Sheet, is a detective story with a tough, smart-assed protagonist. The Red Riding trilogy, which will be released on DVD on August 31, is a sweeping epic covering a decade that evokes The Godfather in what it has to say about its setting and culture, while also being the best police-corruption drama since Prince of the City. A Prophet, about the rise of a criminal, has plenty in common with Scarface, but remains in one location, low-key, and less-than-lavish for much of its running time. In honoring the past, these films create something new.

Which brings us to Animal Kingdom, the brilliant new crime thriller from Australian writer-director David Michôd. Based on the true story of two Melbourne crime families in the 1980s, this film follows three generations of very bad people doing very bad things. When teenager Joshua Cody’s mother dies of a heroin overdose, the inexpressive boy-- nicknamed “J” and played with subtlety by James Frecheville--goes to live with his grandmother and four uncles. Although those uncles are bank robbers and drug dealers, members of a mid-level crime syndicate, the new living situation provides Josh with much-needed stability and comfort ... until rogue police officers kill Barry Brown (Joel Edgerton), the de facto head of that syndicate. The power vacuum created by Brown’s death sends the remaining members of the Cody family into a downward spiral of paranoia and violence, leaving Josh caught between his psychotic uncle “Pope” (Ben Mendelsohn) and a determined police detective, Nathan Leckie (Guy Pearce).

While many reviews of Animal Kingdom compare it to The Godfather, I don’t think those comparisons are fair beyond the surface fact that both features have to do with crime families. Michôd’s direction and style remind me of the best of director Michael Mann’s films, particularly Heat through Collateral. His command of this picture’s visuals helps set it apart from other crime films of a similar nature. While Michôd litters the movie and screenplay with allusions to the title, painting this family as a literal pack of lions, he never overdoes it. You never find yourself rolling your eyes at the metaphor.

Beyond that, the cinematography here is gorgeous, striking, and there’s one sequence near the middle of the film that stunned me with how well put together it was. Animal Kingdom has several wordless sequences like that, including one that’s set to a song from pop titans Air Supply.

Animal Kingdom delivers across-the-board excellent work from everyone behind the scenes, but I’ve got to recognize cinematographer Adam Arkapaw, and the 1980s-ish score from composer Sam Petty. Petty’s music, along with a few key pop-culture references and J’s opening narration, lends the film a timelessness that feels rooted in the past but also very much of the present.

Beyond the technical mastery of this film, Michôd fills his Kingdom (I’m so very sorry, but hey, it was six paragraphs before I got to that first pun) with one of the most impressive cast rosters in recent memory, up to and including Sylvester Stallone’s The Expendables. It’s a true ensemble film, with each actor working in tandem with the others. No performer feels neglected, and each gets more than a couple of moments, big scenes, or monologues in which to shine.

This is James Frecheville’s first film, and I was quite impressed by his work here. J is a hard character to portray, silent and monosyllabic, yet Frecheville excels in the role, more than keeping up with the accomplished actors around him. Luke Ford’s Darren, the lead drug dealer of the family, is similar to J, imperceptible and simmering in silence, but aside from a few scenes, I didn’t really connect with him in the way I did with some of the other players. Still, it’s Frecheville and Ford who make me eager for a second viewing of Animal Kingdom.

Also worth watching is Sullivan Stapleton, as the drug-addicted and paranoid Craig, who delivers one of two star-making performances in Animal Kingdom. One of Michôd’s gifts as a director is letting his actors use silence, and watching Craig simmer gives the film a remarkable tension. More than once, I wondered when Hollywood would come knocking at Stapleton’s door.

I haven’t talked much about Guy Pearce, who’s probably the most recognizable member of the Animal Kingdom cast. His Detective Ed Exley in L.A. Confidential is beloved by me (and probably you), and I couldn’t help but feel he was just playing a variation on that role here, less ethical but still very much a “white knight.” I like Pearce plenty as an actor, and it’s nice to see him working, but he’s merely solid in this film, not groundbreaking like some of the actors around him.

Joel Edgerton is best known to American audiences for his minor part in the Star Wars prequels. As Barry Brown, he’s the anchor for the crime family, and immediately, you understand this guy and where he’s coming from. Barry represents the “good” elements of the family, paternal with J and brotherly with Darren, and if Animal Kingdom has a flaw, it’s that there’s not enough of Edgerton in it.

Which brings us to Ben Mendelsohn and Jacki Weaver, who, along with Michôd, attract most of the critical praise to this film, and rightfully so. Both the psychotic Pope and Weaver’s Janine (nicknamed “Smurf”) rank among the best “villain” performances in recent memory. They know how to use silence in chilling ways; two of the most frightening moments in Animal Kingdom come from scenes in which these characters simply look at other characters, emotion (or lack thereof) playing across their faces.

Mendelsohn is the dark side of the Cody family, manipulative and demented, paranoid in a way that Stapleton isn’t, but single-minded when it comes to protecting himself (and the clan). There’s a scene between him and Luke Ford in which the older man insults Ford’s sexuality, using the young man’s obvious conflict and discomfort to make him agree to what he wants. Weaver has been the face of Animal Kingdom in its ads, and she’s brilliant at portraying the protective lioness under a sweet, grandmotherly demeanor. In my last piece, I mentioned how I'd like to see John Hawkes pick up an Oscar nomination for Best Supporting Actor this year, and right now, I would like nothing more than to see Weaver join him on the Supporting Actress side.

I saw Red Riding in a single afternoon early this year, and while I’ve watched a number of terrific movies since then, I was skeptical that any rivals would top it when it came to being my favorite film of the year. But since spending two hours with the Cody family a week ago, Animal Kingdom might have surpassed that masterpiece as my favorite film of 2010. Not only does this movie bring a great new director roaring (OK, pun number two!) into theaters, but it’s filled with a cast of actors who you’ll swear cinematic loyalty to from here on out. After Animal Kingdom, I’ll watch anything Michôd directs, or anything these actors are in.

Animal Kingdom: so good, it deserves its own verse in “We Are Australians.”

Five Easy Picks

• Congratulations to Irish author and Rap Sheet contributor Declan Burke, who’s putting together a book-length “collection of essays, interviews, and short fictions written by Irish crime writers about the sudden explosion in Irish crime writing ...” He reports further that “this project has been simmering for some time now, but I had a meeting with an Irish publisher last Friday morning and it was finally given the green light. Contracts are in the process of being issued, so it’s probably polite not to name names until all is signed and sealed, but the wheels are in motion ...” If everything goes according to plan, the completed work, Down These Green Streets: Irish Crime Writing in the 21st Century, should be out by the spring of 2011.

• I’m left cold by talk about casting ex-Lost star Josh Holloway taking the lead in NBC-TV’s prospective rebooting of its classic 1974-1980 private-eye series, The Rockford Files. We already ducked a bullet this last spring when a new Rockford pilot, starring Dermot Mulroney, was soundly rejected by the network. But now Entertainment Weekly columnist Michael Ausiello writes:
A Peacock source tells me that the former Lostie’s name has been mentioned in connection to the project, but the insider stresses that there are no serious talks going on at this time. Meanwhile, House exec producer David Shore--who is shepherding the reboot along with Steve Carell’s Carousel Prods and Peter Berg’s Film 44--concedes that Holloway is a “viable choice,” but adds that “it’s too premature” to start naming names. A rep for the actor declined to comment for this story.

“NBC is still high on the project,” adds Shore. “They would like it to happen. Peter Berg’s involved producing and possibly directing and we will be looking for a new lead.”
Give it up, guys. Rockford was one of the finest private-eye series ever to grace American television. But it just wouldn’t have been the same without James Garner as the clever but perpetually down-on-his-luck Los Angeles gumshoe, and it just wouldn’t the same now without him. If Shore wants to make a private-eye series with Holloway, let him produce it; television could sure use a good example of the breed right now. For heavens sake, though, don’t try to resurrect the Rockford brand. Give Holloway’s protagonist a different name and background. He doesn’t have to prove the old saying about there being no new ideas in Hollywood.

• Craig Sisterson has a fine piece in New Zealand’s Weekend Herald about authors Peter Robinson and Peter James, who are visiting his country this week. You can read the whole piece here.

• Steve Scott recalls the contributions of author John D. MacDonald to the Shadow-inspired pulp magazines. Meanwhile, Pornokitsch’s Jared Shurin writes about The Deep Blue Good-by--MacDonald’s first Travis McGee novel--as the pattern-setter for the rest of that well-read series. Not bad for a guy who admits of McGee, “I kind of hate him.”

• And British TV broadcaster ITV has commissioned three new crime dramas for 2011, one of which will come from Anthony Horowitz, creator of the exceptional World War II-era mystery series, Foyle’s War.

Our Clock Is Ticking

In case you haven’t been paying close attention, today is the final day for entering The Rap Sheet’s latest book giveaway contest. The prizes: two free copies of Peter Robinson’s brand-new novel, Bad Boy,

To have a shot at picking up one of these books, all you have to do is e-mail your name and snail-mail address (no P.O. boxes) to jpwrites@wordcuts.org. And be sure to write “Bad Boy Contest” in the subject line. Winners will be chosen at random and announced tomorrow.

Sorry, but at the request of the publisher, this contest is open to residents of the United States and Canada only.

The Ladies’ Game

Recipients of the 2010 Davitt Awards, dispensed annually by Sisters in Crime Australia, were announced on August 30 during the Melbourne Writers Festival. Here are the winners:

Best Adult Crime Novel: Sharp Shooter, by Marianne Delacourt
Best Children’s and Young Adult Fiction: Liar, by Justine Larbalestier
Best True Crime: Lady Killer, by Candace Sutton and Ellen Connolly
Readers’ Choice: Forbidden Fruit, by Kerry Greenwood

You’ll find the longlists of nominees here.

Still to come at the Melbourne Writers Festival is an announcement, expected on Friday, of this year’s Ned Kelly Award winners.

(Hat tip to Mystery Fanfare.)

Sunday, August 29, 2010

Flooded with Painful Memories


It was five years ago today that Hurricane Katrina clobbered southern Louisiana, causing initial storm damage as it passed through, but also provoking the breakdown of New Orleans’ levee system, which led to 80 percent of that beautiful city being flooded and thousands of people losing their homes or their lives. As bad as the natural destruction was, it was compounded by the incompetence of America’s then Republican administration to respond to the needs of Katrina victims. Half a decade later, New Orleans is still suffering the effects of that disaster.

I’ve been to the Crescent City once since Katrina hit, and it’s looking much better than it did in the hurricane’s wake. “New Orleans is coming back,” declared President Obama during an anniversary visit to the city today. He’s right, of course, but it must also be said that Louisiana’s most historic city is a changed place, a place at once stronger and less diverse than it was before the storm. It will be decades before New Orleans overcomes its sadness and cynicism born in those tragic days of 2005. I hope I’ll be around to celebrate its rise from the floodwaters for many years to come.

Saturday, August 28, 2010

“A Hero in an Antihero’s Trench Coat”

Just over a week after author Kelli Stanley championed two of Humphrey Bogart’s motion pictures on this page, self-proclaimed “movie geek” Jake Hinkson has delivered an excellent tribute to Bogie in his own blog, The Night Editor. Hinkson writes, in part:
He’s one of the great noir actors--his best film is one of the greatest noirs of all, In a Lonely Place--but he was too heroic to really embody the noir ethos. For that you need Robert Mitchum. Bogart wouldn’t play the sap for anyone. Mitchum had sap tattooed across his big handsome forehead. Mitchum, in other words, was an antihero.

Bogart was a hero in an antihero’s trench coat. The Maltese Falcon and The Big Sleep and Casablanca aren’t just great movies, they’re instruction for how to live a life of integrity and style. That Bogart didn’t live up to these principals in real life is as ultimately inconsequential as John Wayne’s dodging military service. As actors, their job was to act. Make us laugh or cry or cringe or--this is the tough one--make us aspire to a certain code of behavior.

He explored his dark side in films like In a Lonely Place, The Two Mrs. Carrolls and The Treasure of Sierra the Madre, but he was first and foremost “Bogie,” a figure as heroic and iconic as John Wayne or Gary Cooper. He was more urban than Wayne or Cooper, more gritty than Cary Grant. He fit, in many ways, Chandler’s conception of the character of Philip Marlowe (whom he played in The Big Sleep), the tarnished white knight.
You can enjoy the entirety of Hinkson’s piece here.

A Gathering of Gunmen

The latest short-story offering in Beat to a Pulp is “Gunpoint,” a hard, sparkling little gem by West Virginia pulp fan and writer Fred Blosser.

EBay, Here I Come!

Carolyn Kellogg, the lead writer for the Los Angeles Times’ books blog, Jacket Copy, has a habit of brightening my days. And what do you know, she managed to do it again on Friday--just in time for my 73rd birthday today--by choosing some of her current favorites among the many author-related items for sale on eBay, where I already spend far too much time and money. Here’s one item I’d like to be able to show off to friends and colleagues.

Friday, August 27, 2010

The Book You Have to Read: “The Prone Gunman,” by Jean-Patrick Manchette

(Editor’s note: This is the 103rd installment of our ongoing Friday blog series highlighting great but forgotten books. Today’s selection comes from British novelist Roger “R.J.” Ellory, recent winner of the Theakstons Crime Novel of the Year Award and author of The Anniversary Man. Ellory’s next thriller, Saints of New York, is due out in the UK next month, with a U.S. edition slated for release in early 2011.)

The romanticism of anonymity; the banality of violence: here we have the life of Martin Terrier, Jean-Patrick Manchette’s “Prone Gunman.”

Terse, succinct, almost clipped in style, Manchette’s prose walks out across the pages like the swift, almost automatic methods and mannerisms of his protagonist. Manchette opens this 1981 novel with his Frenchman in an English rural setting, the ancient city of Worcester and its surrounding countryside. Terrier, the assassin, waits patiently in an old Bedford van. He carries an Ortgies automatic handgun with a Redfield silencer. He smokes Gauloises. We imagine he looks unremarkable, not because he is, but because this is the way he wants to look. Like no one. A face you see, and then forget.

His mark, a certain Marshal Dubofsky, appears from a house. The mark kisses his wife and hurries to catch a bus. Terrier follows in the Bedford. The mark alights the bus in the center of Worcester. He enters a cinema where they are showing an unremarkable thriller starring Charles Bronson, also a regional black-and-white comedy with Diane Cilento. Terrier waits again until a third character--“a fake redhead dressed in a poppy-red-three-quarter-length coat of acrylic fur, wearing scarlet lipstick, too much mascara, and black plastic boots with very high heels”--exits the cinema and starts to walk. Dubofsky also exits and quickly follows her. We anticipate a rendezvous, a meeting between Dubofsky, a married man, and this woman. Terrier follows them in the van. He overtakes. He exits the vehicle. Dubofsky almost walks into him.

What then happens establishes the clean, uncomplicated, pragmatic, and unemotional attitude that Terrier applies to all his work assignments. What happens then does not need to be detailed here.

And so we meet Manchette’s “Terrier.” Did Manchette choose as such to convey the insistent, aggressive, unrelenting nature of the breed of dog after which his hero is named? Did he begin this book with a view that here he would present us with the most clinical and methodical individual he could imagine, yet engaged in “work” that would ordinarily provoke the most alarming of mental and emotional reactions in any normal human being? Is Terrier deranged, psychotic, homophobic? Who is this man, and why is he this way? How can he do such things with such composed equanimity? Apparently sangfroid and imperturbable, Terrier continues to alarm and unnerve with his utter lack of emotional connection. I cannot help but read this work and think of Frederick Forsyth’s “Jackal,” a man we never get to grips with in any depth. Perhaps here Manchette has given us the back story of all such men, a brief glimpse of the internal world of such characters: men beyond the emotional horizon, men who can not and do not operate within any frame of reference or context that we can seriously comprehend.

Yet this is no catalogue of horrors. Despite the fact that Manchette walks us through the awkward, unreasoning, unquestioning life of Martin Terrier; although he gives us ringside seats to the strange circus that is the existence of this cold-hearted and unremittingly bleak killer, Manchette also gives us a window into the soul of an ultimately broken man. The circular nature of this short and powerful novel, the fact that two relationships--first and foremost, Terrier’s relationship with his own father, and then, perhaps no less important, Terrier’s “ten-year plan” to secure the love of a woman--lie at the very center of this brutal piece, show us that Manchette, a brilliant stylist and wordsmith, was not simply trying to shock, but was also trying to understand, explain, perhaps even rationalize the raison d’être of this vicious little dog of a man, Martin Terrier. The nom de guerre assumed by Terrier for his assignments--Christian--is also ultimately French, perhaps Manchette’s desire to present us with the dichotomies and contradictions that drive such an individual to be who he is, and to do what he does. The methods of self-justification employed by Terrier and his colleagues, the fact that they approach all they do so systematically, the questions that are raised as to the identity of the organization to which these people belong, who they work for, whether they are government-sanctioned or private ... these are all opened, but never fully closed. We never really understand the whys and wherefores, and Manchette--I believe--never intended us to.

Manchette stated that the crime novel was “the great moral literature of our time,” and I concur. Crime, as a genre, encompasses all: romance, politics, culture, social commentary, psychology, history, ethics, morals, philosophy, religion. All subjects and concerns are found addressed in crime fiction. I heard only a week ago that if one cared to look at the hundred most popular classics of the last two centuries, how many of them--strictly speaking--were crime novels? A great deal, the speaker said, and I could do nothing but agree.

Jean-Patrick Manchette died young, only 52 when he passed away in Paris. Born in Marseilles in 1942, he was credited with reinventing and reinvigorating the crime-fiction genre in France. He did not write Maigret. He did not write banal and predictable police procedurals. His stories are violent, existential essays on the human condition, more visceral than cerebral. They are American noir transposed into a harsh, cool, French reality. Three to Kill (translated into English, originally published as Le Petit Bleu de la Côte Ouest) and this volume, The Prone Gunman (published in French as La Position du Tireur Couché) are currently available, and New York Review Books Classics has scheduled the release of a third, Fatale, in 2011.

Manchette left us with a punishing look into a brutal world. It is not easy reading, but then we do not read crime fiction to be transported into some comforting reality. We read crime fiction for a thousand different reasons, all as valid as one another, but none more important than the need to experience by proxy those lives that we otherwise never could.

Terrier’s is a cruel life, and that cruelty he delivers to others in equal measure. A window is opened into his world, and through that window we see what he is. It is not a pleasant view. It is dark and unforgiving. And what becomes of Terrier? Well, it has been said that ultimately one becomes that which one fears the most. Justice, in a strange trick of irony, awaits him, and--as with all things he undertakes--he methodically and systematically meets his schedule.

Rediscovered Reads

In addition to R.J. Ellory’s endorsement on this page of The Prone Gunman, by French novelist Jean-Patrick Manchette, today’s Web-wide crop of “forgotten books” in the crime-fiction category includes: Death of a Source, by Richard Moore; Rain, by Karen Duve; The Only Girl in the Game, by John D. MacDonald; Maigret and the Death of a Harbor-Master, by Georges Simenon; The Scarf, by Francis Durbridge; The Burglar Who Studied Spinoza, by Lawrence Block; Death of a Busybody, by Dell Shannon; Undercover Run, by Lew Dykes; Run for Home, by Sheila Quigley; Crimson Joy, by Robert B. Parker, and Backhand, by Liza Cody.

Series organizer Patti Abbott offers a full rundown of today’s participating writers in her own blog, plus four more oft-neglected books worth discovering, one of them being Gil Brewer’s 1956 novel, --And the Girl Screamed.

Just a Quick Reminder ...

... that The Rap Sheet’s latest book giveaway contest will end this coming Monday, August 30, at midnight. We have two copies of Peter Robinson’s brand-new Alan Banks/Annie Cabbot novel, Bad Boy, to send free of charge to a couple of fortunate blog readers.

To enter this competition, all you need do is e-mail your name and snail-mail address (no P.O. boxes) to jpwrites@wordcuts.org. And be sure to write “Bad Boy Contest” in the subject line. Winners will be chosen at random and announced on Tuesday.

Sorry, but at the request of the publisher, this contest is open to residents of the United States and Canada only.

Don’t Give Up Hope!

This strikes me as a very promising development: The Web site TV Shows on DVD.com brings news that The Snoop Sisters, a 1973-1974 U.S. series broadcast under the NBC Wednesday Mystery Movie umbrella, will be released in DVD format by Canada’s Visual Entertainment Inc. (VEI) during the first quarter of 2011. Of that series, Thrilling Days of Yesteryear blogger Ivan G. Shreve Jr. writes:
Helen Hayes and Mildred Natwick starred as Ernesta and Gwendolyn Snoop (in Gwen’s case, Snoop-Nicholson, because she had been married), two elderly sisters who channeled their inner Jane Marple and solved crimes in their copious needlepoint-occupied free time. The show also starred Tattletales host Bert Convy as their nephew and contact on the police force, Lt. Steve Ostrowski and future TV director Lou Antonio as Barney, an ex-con who worked as their chauffeur. (Elderly women not behind the wheel of a car? Obviously this show did not take place in Florida.) Because it rotated with the returning Banacek and two new series, Tenafly and Faraday and Company, Sisters only telecast four episodes before being cancelled at the end of the season ... but all four of these installments and the original 1972 pilot will be available on [VEI’s] three-disc collection ...
I find this news interesting, not because I haven’t seen The Snoop Sisters in decades (I actually purchased a bootleg copy of the series and its pilot a few years back), but because the unexpected release of Sisters in DVD suggests other TV mystery dramas that never achieved cult status or generated dozens of episodes might also appear in stores sometime in the foreseeable future. Dare I hope that Harry O, City of Angels, Petrocelli, Hec Ramsey, Hooperman, Cool Million, Banyon, Private Eye, Assignment: Vienna, The Duke, and Search, as well as the aforementioned Tenafly and Faraday and Company, might eventually be added to my collection of vintage TV shows on DVD?

One other series that I can be guaranteed of adding soon to my shelves is the gumshoe drama Johnny Staccato. As TV Shows on DVD explains:
Johnny Staccato--starring legendary actor, writer and director Johnny Cassavetes-first appeared on TV in 1959, and although it lasted only 27 episodes, the unique mixture of big-city mystery-adventure and jazz left an indelible impression on a generation of TV viewers. Johnny is an ex-jazz musician/detective who finds himself drawn into cases where his distaste for crime, criminals and injustice is put to test. Many notable Hollywood guest stars include Michael Landon, Martin Landau, Shirley Knight, famed soundtrack musician John Williams, Dean Stockwell, Elisha Cook, Susan Oliver, Gena Rowlands, Elizabeth Montgomery, Norman Fell, Cloris Leachman, and Mary Tyler Moore!
The three-disc set of Johnny Staccato is due out on October 12.

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

“This Is Not a Women’s Lib Drama”

Following my mention last week of the 1974-1975 TV program Amy Prentiss, one of the less-well-remembered segments of the classic NBC Mystery Movie “wheel series,” several Rap Sheet readers wrote to me, inquiring whether I knew anything more about that show. I’m sorry to say I don’t, really. I clearly remember watching all three episodes of that Ironside spin-off, plus the pilot, but I do not have any of them on tape or DVD.

However, in digging through my files earlier this week, I came across a time-yellowed newspaper clipping from the Portland Oregonian in which star Jessica Walter talks with Francis Murphy, then the broadsheet’s TV columnist, about winning her small-screen role as the San Francisco Police Department’s first woman chief of detectives. I’m only guessing, based on the fact that this article mentions the Amy Prentiss pilot in the past tense (it was broadcast on May 23, 1974) and alludes to a Hawaii Five-O episode to “be shown this fall,” that it was published sometime during the summer of ’74. (Unfortunately, I was too young at the time I scissored this out of Oregon’s largest daily paper to realize that it might be useful someday to have written the date on it!)

For anyone who’s interested, the Murphy column is featured on the left. Simply click on the image to enlarge and read it.

I Didn’t See This One Coming

As reported in the blog Central Crime Zone:
Tyrus Book, Inc. today announced the acquisition of Busted Flush Press, LLC., in a move that brings together two of crime fiction’s most recognizable independent presses.

“We’re very excited to add the Busted Flush brand to Tyrus Books. David Thompson is a dedicated and tireless advocate of crime fiction and I look forward to seeing the Busted Flush brand continue to grow,” said Benjamin LeRoy, publisher and president of Tyrus Books.
(Hat tip to Bill Crider’s Pop Culture Magazine.)

Gillis Gone

It’s being reported that renowned screenwriter Jackson Gillis “died peacefully Thursday, August 19, 2010,” in Moscow, Idaho, just “two days shy of his 94th birthday.” The cause of death is listed as pneumonia.

During his long career, Gillis was a key contributor to The Adventures of Superman as well as Perry Mason, and he scored plenty of other credits on TV crime dramas, including Columbo, Mannix, Mission: Impossible, Ironside, Hawaii Five-O, Longstreet, Cade’s County, and The Snoop Sisters. The Crime TV History Blog adds that Gillis wrote “two scripts in collaboration with cult pulp novelist Day Keene” for Burke’s Law. His work on Columbo earned him both Emmy and Edgar Allan Poe award nominations.

The Gumshoe Site notes that Gillis “also authored two detective novels, Killers of Starfish (Lipponcott, 1977) and Chain Saw (St. Martin’s, 1988).” I remember reading and enjoying Killers of Starfish, which was set around Seattle and starred retired Los Angeles homicide investigator Jonas Duncan, but I don’t recall Chain Saw.

READ MORE:Jackson Gillis, Prolific Writer of TV Drama, Dies at 93,” by Bruce Weber (The New York Times); “TV Writer Jackson Gillis Passes On,” by Mercurie (A Shroud of Thoughts); “Jackson Gillis Dies, Longtime TV Writer Who Dabbled in Spy Adventures” (The HMSS Weblog).

007 Turns 80

We offer our best birthday wishes today to the man who, for many filmgoers and spy-fiction fans, will always be James Bond. Sir Thomas Sean Connery--better known as Scottish actor Sean Connery--was born on this date back in 1930. I think that calls for a toast, don’t you? One vodka martini, please, shaken, not stirred.

(Hat tip to The HMSS Weblog.)

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

The Stark World of Parker

(Editor’s note: Today we welcome to The Rap Sheet Seamus Scanlon, writing on the late Donald E. Westlake’s Parker series. A librarian and professor at The City College of New York, Scanlon has contributed fiction to the Global City Review, Promethean, the Review of Post Graduate English Studies, and the Journal of Experimental Fiction. He was a finalist in the 2009 New Irish Writing Awards.)

The University of Chicago Press has already finished reissuing the first 12 crime novels by Richard Stark (Donald E. Westlake), and three more--Deadly Edge, Slayground, and Plunder Squad--will follow them to bookstores next month. The publisher hopes eventually to bring out the full set of 24 works.

This republication of Westlake/Stark’s series, which features professional thief Parker (and now carries elegant covers by David Drummond, whose clients include academic and literary presses, as well as Amnesty International), is both a vindication and a recognition of the literary integrity and purity of the writing that first assailed the noir fiction scene 48 years ago, when The Hunter debuted. Even all these decades later, the Parker novels still retain their vibrancy and power. They’re accomplished works that showcase the ethos of noir fiction--bleak, uncompromising, high fidelity, purposeful, unrelenting, non-squeamish. Westlake died suddenly on December 31, 2008, but I imagine he would have been very pleased to see his early books re-released for a new generation of crime-fiction enthusiasts.

Beginning with The Mourner, the fourth entry in the Parker series, these reprinted works have included forewords by such authors as John Banville (aka Benjamin Black), Dennis Lehane, Luc Sante, and Charles Ardai, which attests to the virtuosity of Westlake’s writing and the esteem with which he is regarded. Man Booker Prize winner Banville contends that Parker “is the perfection of that existential man whose earliest models we met in Nietzsche and Kierkegaard and Dostoevsky ... Parker will have recognized his own natural motto in Faust’s heaven-defying declaration--‘In the beginning was the deed.’”

All of the novels in the Parker series--which ended in 2008 with Dirty Money--hum with Westlake’s mix of lean prose, crisp dialogue, authentic capers, and stylish plots revolving around the protagonist, Parker (no first name--or maybe no surname), a villain’s villain with a self-referring inflexible moral code, which he abides by with a fierce adherence to an internal logic and ruthlessness. Parker is single-minded, aloof, self reliant, anti-establishment, and even anti-organized-crime-establishment. What could be more anarchic? The voice we first heard in 1962 remains just as authentic and modern today--a tremendous achievement.

While working at Cambridge University in the 1990s, I chanced upon some of the Parker books in the Allison & Busby American Crime Series. I still recall the striking monochrome covers and their bright blood-red price stickers. I bought The Black Ice Score the first day and read it in one sitting. I bought the rest of the series the next day. It was my first introduction to crime fiction, and the best introduction--tautly composed and executed tales that were seamless and searing.

The opening page of The Hunter succinctly captures Parker’s persona, as the hardened thief stalks across the George Washington Bridge, which spans the wide Hudson River and links Fort Lee, New Jersey, with Washington Heights in Manhattan, where “the black holes” of Gotham’s subways beckon. I have walked that same bridge myself--it sways under your feet because of the wind and the high volume of vehicles on its upper and lower traffic levels. This opening scene also evokes the deep folk memory of America in Parker’s manifest individualism, self-reliance, and steeliness. The physical landscape of the Palisades and the wide vista of the Hudson, where Indian war canoes once traversed, ideally augments the subliminal recall of the American essence.

The hardcore noir anti-hero is established--the resolute champion of the Western frontier recast in a modern outlaw mien. No one can mistake Parker for anything but trouble, the fearsome and fearless renegade we both admire and look at with alarm, who causes women to feel uncomfortable and men to frown at him with latent unease, and who makes us ashamed of our own petty trepidation.

Westlake’s cold, taut prose mirrors Parker’s nature and demeanor:
His hands, swinging curve-fingered at his sides, looked like they were molded of brown clay by a sculptor who thought big and liked veins. ... His face was a chipped chunk of concrete, with eyes of flawed onyx. His mouth was a quick stroke, bloodless. His suit coat fluttered behind him, and his arms swung easily as he walked.
In The Hunter Parker storms into Manhattan after being double-crossed by his wife and a gang member named Mal. He is looking for revenge and his money. He’s determined that nothing will stop him--and nothing does.

By page 16 we know Mal is in deep trouble. Says Parker:
“I’m going to drink his blood. I’m going to chew up his heart and spit it into the gutter for the dogs to raise a leg at. I’m going to peel the skin off him and rip out his veins and hang him with them.” He sat in the chair, his fists clenching and unclenching, his eyes glaring at her. He snatched up the coffee cup and hurled it. It caromed off the refrigerator and shattered on the edge of the sink, then sprayed onto the floor.
I dare anyone to stop reading after that beginning; I couldn’t.

Once Parker catches up with Mal and learns his money was given to the minions of organized crime (aka the Outfit) to repay a debt, he kills Mal and barely pauses before pursuing the dough. He is dedicated to his goal. Most mortals would probably say, “OK, it’s gone--I can’t compete against the Outfit (Mafia),” but Parker is relentless, driven to secure his money regardless of the opposition arrayed against him, which appears formidable. In the end, he outwits his foes and recovers his stolen cash.

In a long-ago interview, Westlake said he had fun writing the Parker books, and it shows. These works are full of brio, audacity, and wordplay. They offered sudden changes of focus, location, and action long before Quentin Tarantino used those same devices to great effect. The narrative timelines are often fractured, but they never lose the reader’s interest or commitment; on the contrary, they increase the reader’s enjoyment, because you experience the same scene more than once from different perspectives. Westlake was a true revolutionary in the field of noir fiction as well as an accomplished stylist, storyteller, and writer.

Crime fiction by Dashiell Hammett, Raymond Chandler, Kenneth Fearing, and others has been published by the Library of America, while Everyman’s Library has produced volumes by Hammett, Chandler, and James M. Cain. Now the University of Chicago Press celebrates Westlake/Stark’s Parker stories. Although the cachet of such recognition cannot be considered a final arbitrator of taste, it certainly proves right the librarians, critics, and general readers who believed all along that these works were endowed with particularly high-quality writing, pacing, and plots.

I await Donald E. Westlake’s promotion to the exalted altar of noir writers, and expect the reissuing of the Parker series will go a long way toward helping him achieve that.

Oxford Dawns

Our thanks go to Janet Rudolph of Mystery Fanfare for reminding us that five new episodes of the excellent British TV series Inspector Lewis, starring Kevin Whately and Laurence Fox, will begin running this coming Sunday, August 29, under PBS’ Masterpiece Mystery! umbrella. This run of new episodes will continue through Sunday, September 26. Check your local listings for start times.

Hospice for Publishers?

In today’s edition of Jacket Copy, Los Angeles Times blogger Carolyn Kellogg brings attention to a possibly satirical but not entirely incredible suggestion made by Bob Stein in The Institute for the Future of the Book’s blog, if:book. Stein writes:
One of my best friends’ parents both became very ill this year. Her mother, 87, elected to have a feeding tube inserted permanently. She is confined to her bed, alone much of the time, and in constant pain, waiting for the inevitable end, which thanks to the feeding tube may be many miserable months ahead. Her father, 90, elected to enter a hospice facility where he spent his last three weeks eating yogurt, sipping the occasional last whiskey, and having long wonderful visits with his three children, their spouses and his beloved grown grandchildren. By all accounts it was a very good death.

Thinking about my friend’s parents makes we wonder why their [sic] couldn’t be a “hospice” option for publishers, many of whom--my low-end guess is at least 50%--won’t survive the transition from print to networked screens. If a publisher doesn’t have the requisite vision, desire and resources to embrace digital, what’s wrong with saying, “Gee, it’s been a great 25, 50, 100-year run. Instead of beating our heads against a wall and dying an ugly death, why don’t we go out in style.” Once this difficult decision is arrived at, it would be a matter of selling the assets that can be sold, providing staff with generous severance and really helping them to find new jobs, and then at the very end giving some wonderful parties, celebrating the end of an era. A death with integrity and dignity intact.

Please understand that I make this suggestion with huge love and respect for publishers. At their best they have played a crucial role in the complex discourse that moves society forward. Like a beloved parent, there’s no reason why they should suffer more than necessary at the end of a full and productive life.
An interesting--if depressing--thought, indeed.

Monday, August 23, 2010

“Bad” Is Good for You

After announcing the winners of The Rap Sheet’s most recent book giveaway contest (the prizes being two free copies of Sara Paretsky’s new novel, Body Work), did we not promise to mount another such competition later this month? Well, here you go.

Publisher William Morrow has provided us with two hardcover copies of Peter Robinson’s brand-spanking-new Alan Banks/Annie Cabbot novel, Bad Boy, to send free of charge to a couple of fortunate Rap Sheet readers. Here’s what Publishers Weekly said about the book:
Robinson tries something different in his excellent 19th novel to feature Det. Chief Insp. Alan Banks (after All the Colors of Darkness) by keeping the Yorkshire policeman offstage for the first half of the book. Banks’s daughter, Tracy, knows that her friend, Erin Doyle, is dating a bad boy. But she doesn’t know how bad Jaff McCready is until the recovery of a gun at Erin’s parents’ home results in a fatal accident. Before Tracy knows what’s happening, Jaff whisks her on an adventure, eventually hiding out at Banks’s house while her father is on holiday in America. As Det. Insp. Annie Cabbot searches for Jaff, Tracy’s infatuation turns sour when she finds Jaff’s suitcase of drugs, money, and a gun, and becomes his hostage. When Banks returns to Yorkshire, he has to balance his roles as a cop and a father. Robinson deftly integrates Banks’s personal life with an acute look at British attitudes about police, guns, and violence in this strong entry in a superb series.
The plot sounds good, doesn’t it? And after reading and enjoying most of Robinson’s Banks books, I look forward to diving into this one myself.

If you would like to pick up one of The Rap Sheet’s two free copies of Bad Boy, all you need to do is e-mail your name and snail-mail address (no P.O. boxes) to jpwrites@wordcuts.org. And be sure to write “Bad Boy Contest” in the subject line. Entries will be accepted between now and midnight next Monday, August 30. Winners will be chosen at random, and their names will be listed on this page the following day.

We’re sorry, but at the request of the publisher, this contest is open to residents of the United States and Canada only.

So are you sending in your entry yet? What’s keeping you?

READ MORE:“Ya Wanna Do It Here or Down the Station, Punk?”: Peter Robinson,” by Declan Burke (Crime Always Pays).

Deathspotting

Would you plan a vacation around the sites of infamous crimes, shoot-outs, or kidnappings? If so, Salon’s Sarah D. Bunting has a few suggestions of stops you must make along the way.

Sunday, August 22, 2010

Easy Pickin’s

• This should be interesting: TV writer/producer William Link--the man responsible for such favorite shows as Columbo, Mannix, Ellery Queen, and Murder, She Wrote--will be one of the special guests on the next two-hour edition of TV Confidential, premiering tomorrow night, August 23, at 9 p.m ET/6 p.m. PT on Shokus Internet Radio. The episode will be rebroadcast this coming Friday, August 27, at 7 p.m. ET/PT on Share-a-Vision Radio, KSAV.org. I’ve been advised that the Link interview will air during the second half of the program. The first half will focus on character actor Denny Miller, “who has appeared in just about every major television show of the last four decades, including Gunsmoke, Gilligan’s Island, The Fugitive, The Rockford Files, and Dr. Quinn, Medicine Woman.” Learn more here.

• How idiotic! NBC-TV is still trying to relaunch The Rockford Files. Hasn’t the network already learned that this is a really bad idea?

• Things are looking up for Hard Case Crime. Editor Charles Ardai reports that he’s talking with eight other houses about picking up his popular paperback line from troubled publisher Dorchester.

• This week’s new short story in Beat to a Pulp comes from Arizona writer Garnett Elliott. His tale is called “The Worms of Terpsichore.”

• Good for Governor Jennifer Granholm of Michigan, who is calling bullshit on a Republican scheme to “effectively dismantle” America’s Social Security and Medicare systems.

• I’ve added a brand-new link to The Rap Sheet’s ever-expanding blogroll, connecting you to Crime Time Preview. Writer Robin Jarossi, a London-based TV journalist and monthly contributor to Shots, says that his new blog will focus “on all crime/thrillers coming onto UK TV--from Marple to Boardwalk Empire.” He concedes, “It’s in its early stages, but with a lot of exciting programming coming in the autumn, I hope it will hit its stride soon. New progs getting a review later this week (when embargoes are lifted) will include U Be Dead and Law & Order: UK, both of which I enjoyed.” Check it out when you get a chance.

• I guess this is good news. Mystery Scene magazine will go full-color, beginning with its Fall 2010 issue, to go on sale in September.

• Although Laura Lippman has had to limit her personal appearances to promote I’d Know You Anywhere (Morrow), her new standalone thriller, she has set up an intriguing competition through which you can win a visit from her to your local library. “So here’s the deal,” she explains on her Web site. “Write an essay about your hometown library and why I should visit. It can be personal--an anecdote about how you learned to write your name in order to get your library card there, or how you curled up on the window seat in the children’s room to read a beloved book on a snowy day. It can be factual, with details about how many people use the library and why it’s central to the community. I’ll pick my favorite essay and will then visit, completely at my own expense, at a mutually agreeable date within the next year.” To participate, send your essay via e-mail (the eddress is posted at the link) by September 30, 2010.

• Who knew there were so many pulpy novels with “X” in the title? Or with gigantic floating heads on their covers? (Hat tip to Bill Crider.)

• Margot Kinberg focuses on partnerships in the writing of crime fiction for her latest post in Confessions of a Mystery Novelist ...

Another fine piece from The Washington Post’s Eugene Robinson.

• Interviews worth your reading time: J. Sydney Jones talks with Ann Cleeves about her Shetland Quartet and Vera Stanhope books; Richard Prosch of Meridian Bridge features a two-part discussion with Beat to a Pulp editor David Cranmer (Part I is here, Part II is here); Craig Sisterson hits crime writer and poet Sophie Hannah (A Room Swept White) with nine questions; Canadian novelist Gail Bowen (The Nesting Dolls) submits the answers to nine of her publisher’s queries; Tony Buchsbaum interviews Justin Cronin (The Passage) for January Magazine; and Hank Phillippi Ryan puts the screws to Lee Goldberg for a post in the Sisters-in-Crime blog.

• Sarah Weinman considers the legacy of the Charlie Chan novels.

• The USA Network turns thumbs up on a second season of Covert Affairs, the spy series starring Piper Perabo and Christopher Gorham.

• And journalist Ben Terrall, the son of longtime crime-genre star Robert Terrall (aka Robert Kyle), has a few things to say about the corruption exposed in editor Paco Ignacio Taibo II’s Mexico City Noir. Read his review in the San Francisco Bay Guardian.

Reshaping the World, One Book at a Time

Anyone who revels in books should enjoy The Book in the Renaissance (Yale University Press), a tremendous new history of what people--as opposed to collectors--were buying and reading in 16th-century Europe.

Explaining how the age of the Internet has finally made it possible to write this volume, Andrew Pettegree, head of the School of History at the University of St. Andrews in Scotland, says: “The more mundane productions of the press inevitably attracted less attention and admiration. But such books--almanacs and calendars, prayer books and pamphlets--were the bedrock of the new [publishing] industry. They also offer the most eloquent window into the thought world of the sixteenth century’s new generation of readers ... Tracing the sole surviving copies of these little books had been an almost impossible task. Now, though, the sudden proliferation of online resources, catalogues and search engines allows us to gather together a vast amount of data ... This book represents a first attempt to take advantage of these global searches.”

As reviewer Bryce Christensen writes in his starred review in Booklist:
Looking back on her early adulthood, St. Teresa of Ávila remarked, “If I did not have a new book, I did not feel that I could be happy.” In this history of the pioneering publishers who transformed [Johannes] Gutenberg’s new technology into an epoch-making force, Pettegree recounts the fascinating story of how new books found their way into the hands of Renaissance readers such as St. Teresa. That force, as readers soon realize, reshaped the world of learning, as affordable books swelled enrollment in universities and multiplied municipal schools. But the force of the printed word emerged far from the classroom, as printing presses become potent weapons in political and ecclesiastical conflicts ... Though readers gain considerable understanding of technical processes of publishing ... what they come to see most clearly is the tense political and economic circumstances in which Renaissance publishers operated ...
We’ll see if e-books can have anywhere near so profound an impact.

Friday, August 20, 2010

The Story Behind the Story: “Peeler,”
by Kevin McCarthy

(Editor’s note: This 14th installment of our “Story Behind the Story” series takes us back in time and across the Atlantic Ocean, to the remarkably dangerous Ireland of 1920. Our guide is Irish writer Kevin McCarthy, author of the recently released novel Peeler [Mercier Press], which the Belfast Telegraph called a “multi-layered, morally complex masterpiece,” and The Irish Times said is “strong on historical detail and assured in its plotting.” Readers who have already enjoyed that book and its protagonist, cop Sean O’Keefe, will be pleased to hear from the author that “I’m currently working on a sequel to Peeler, tentatively titled Irregulars and set during the [Irish] Civil War. I plan a series of O’Keefe novels charting the foundation of the Irish Free State from the bottom up. Kind of a revisionist look at Irish independence and nationhood from the perspective of a serving police constable/detective.” Below, McCarthy recounts how he came to pen his debut historical crime novel.)

The first thing, inevitably, your friends--or anyone, for that matter--asks when they discover you’ve written a novel that is about to be published is: “What’s it about?” To this, over time, you come up with a summary of sorts, reducing three years of work to a pitch line straight out of Robert Altman’s The Player. “It’s called Peeler. It’s about the brutal murder of a woman during the Irish War of Independence. A good cop, an RIC--Royal Irish Constabulary--man, a wounded veteran of the Great War, investigates the murder while the Irish Republican Army (IRA) investigates it from their side.”

“Sounds cool,” your friend says. “I didn’t know you studied Irish history.”

I didn’t. But I did to write this book. Researching a historical novel is the fun part. It is where you take your general knowledge of a time and place in history, and read out from there and then, read in--primary sources, first-hand accounts, police reports, diaries, letters--narrowing the focus until you get inside the heads and the hearts of the men and women who were living through it. How they acted. Why they acted. What they felt. In this, you get beneath the skin of the accepted versions we’re taught in school. Get to the underbelly, so to speak.

The accepted version is what you are, in essence, reading against and if you read enough, you find that this version merely skims the surface of the truth of Irish history at best. Skims the surface wielding a large brush and bucket of green paint at worst. The interesting thing for me has always been the parts that this conventional, accepted history leaves out.

J.G. Farrell, the Liverpool-Irish novelist, renowned for his historical fictions, who died in 1979, too young, only a few miles from where I set Peeler in West Cork, wrote: “History leaves so much out … It leaves out the most important thing: the detail of what being alive is like.” The best historical fiction strives to rectify this--filling the gaps in “history” with the imagined motives and passions of ordinary men and women in times distant from our own but similarly human. From Robert Graves to Stephen Crane to James Ellroy to Alan Furst--all of these writers scour the margins, scrape and prod at the underbelly of the time and place and characters they’ve used and invented to re-create the “detail of what being alive is like”--in Imperial Rome or a Civil War battlefield or wartime Los Angeles or wartime Bulgaria. With the exception of Graves, they write about the bit players in the larger historical dramas as if they were the grandest players on the stage of history, and this is exactly how it should be, because this is how history is to every one of us as we are living through it.

Get beyond the accepted version--seek the detail of what being alive (or dead) was like--and the War of Independence in Ireland (1919-1921) becomes one fought at close range. More men were killed with revolvers than any other type of weapon. Shotguns were often used, again at close quarters. More often than not, killers knew their victims personally. It was a gangland-style war, with tit-for-tat murders rather than pitched battles. A war of hit men and death squads on both sides, hunting marked targets and targets of opportunity.

The version that Irish children are taught in school is one of set-piece battles and masterfully planned ambushes; of outnumbered Irish Flying Columns sending hardened British Army troops fleeing in retreat. These things happened, you learn, but rarely. More often, the violence took place in fetid alleys and darkened lanes. Assassinations were spawned in brothels used by Crown troops, whores touting to rebel gunmen and “donating” money to the IRA arms fund.

It was in this underbelly of society where Irish rebels fought their War of Independence against the British government. It is also in that underbelly where crime novels are generally set. So it seemed only natural that Peeler should take the form of a crime novel. A police procedural, but one fraught with the ambiguities and depravity of a guerrilla war waged in the long shadow of the Great War in Europe and 800 years of foreign occupation. Ambiguities such as: Charged with enforcing law and order under the Crown, most Peelers--Catholic and Protestant alike--desired independence for Ireland. They were rightly terrified by the campaign of murder being waged against them by the IRA, and yet felt only disgust for most of the Black and Tans and Auxiliaries brought to Ireland to help with “policing.” Brilliant contradictions that are so human you can’t not write about them.

And life outside--the details of my living--intervenes to shape a novel. As I sit here, now, typing this, I can hear the burping rattle of light and heavy machine guns from a live firing exercise at Gormanstown Army barracks, a couple of miles north of my home on the east coast of Ireland. Throughout the writing of Peeler, this was often the case and oddly appropriate, given the subject matter of my book. There is one line in the novel, in fact, that I wrote--not an important one, but a small line of atmospheric detail--just because I happened to hear the gunnery exercise that day when I was writing the scene. It involves a post-curfew prowl through the war-ravaged streets of Cork city by the protagonist, RIC Sergeant Séan O’Keefe, who “made it back to the Daly house without seeing another soul in the streets, sticking to the shadows, using alleys and laneways when he could. Damp pavements. Shot out streetlamps. The distant roar of revving engines, bursts of machine-gun fire.” Of course, I have taken my description of wartime Cork from any number of contemporary accounts, but I’m not sure if I would have included that last bit, the “bursts of machine-gun fire,” had I not heard, just then from outside my window, the sustained, mechanical pop-pop-pop, stu-tt-tt-tter of the gunners in Gormanstown. The outside world intruding, living detail.

Like all novels, I imagine, Peeler came from a serendipitous convergence of sensations and objects and events. For me: books stumbled upon, snippets of conversation, a plaque on a bridge.

With Peeler, I chanced upon Myles Dungan’s Irish Voices from the Great War (1995) in the local library returned books stack. Entering the library, I always make my way to this pile first for some reason, and always have since I was a child, anxious to see what others have been reading. More often than not, it’s self-help and the driver’s theory test or Harry Potter novels, but the odd time, a gem like this one reveals itself. Halfway through the reading of Irish Voices--first-hand accounts of World War I on all its fronts from the diaries and letters of Irishmen who fought, brilliantly compiled and contextualised--it occurred to me to write a fictional account of the bloody, 1915 assault on V Beach by the Dublin and Munster Fusiliers in the Dardanelles, at which more than 1,000 Irishmen died in a single morning. Fortunately, I didn’t write it, as the book I outlined on the back of an envelope was strikingly similar to Sebastian Barry’s A Long, Long Way, which was published halfway through my second draft of Peeler. But a seed was planted.

Luck would have it, however, that a second book landed in front of me at roughly the same time, courtesy of my mother-in-law’s research into her own father’s service in the Royal Irish Constabulary. (“Your father was an RIC man? I thought he owned a shop?” “He did, after he retired from the Peelers … He’s listed here, in this book …”)

Jim Herlihy’s The Royal Irish Constabulary: A Short History and Geneaological Guide (1997) is a fantastic history and compendium of the names and details of service of virtually every man who once served in the RIC, researched and written by a serving member of the Garda Síochána (the police force of the Republic of Ireland). Reading this, I discovered that many RIC men had volunteered to serve in the Great War and returned--if they returned at all--to another, more personalized sort of warfare in Ireland in which they had become the primary targets of the IRA campaign for independence. The story in my head began to slowly shift and reshape itself. Questions arising, conflicting with my previous assumptions. Irish men killing other Irish men for the sake of Irish Independence? That was the Irish Civil War, wasn’t it? No, not yet. It wasn’t just the IRA vs. brutal Black and Tans and the British Army? No. Yes. There is more to this, I felt. Dig deeper, go wider to the margins and then hone in, find the detail of what being a copper, a gunman, a Black and Tan was like.

Then, there is the plaque on the small bridge in my town. It is outside of a pub I drink in, and I pass it every time I enter the pub. It reads: “Near this spot Seamus Lawless and Sean Gibbons were Brutally Done to Death by British Forces while in their custody. September 20, 1920. Ar dheis De go raib a n-anam.” (May their souls be at the right hand of God.)

It is well-known locally, that these Occupying Forces were trainee members of the Black and Tans based at the training depot at Gormanstown Aerodrome--now home to the Irish Army and the live firing exercises I can hear from my room--who sacked the town in revenge for the killing of an RIC man who had just been promoted to district inspector. This RIC man had been drinking in a local bar with his brother, also an RIC man, to celebrate the promotion, when they became involved in an argument--about politics, no doubt--with some members of the local IRA company. Drink had been taken, so the story goes--as do most of the crime reports from the local newspaper today--and a pistol was produced, a man shot dead, the town burnt to the ground and two men tortured, then bayoneted to death and left in the middle of the road at dawn amidst the smoldering ruins. What, I couldn’t help but think, were two armed policemen--men with a bounty on their heads throughout the country--doing drinking in a bar with armed republicans? What was it like living, drinking, working in a town, a nation, where virtually anybody could be armed and there were more police per capita than almost any country in the world at the time and yet, common crime was rampant? What kind of war was the War of Independence?

It was the kind of war, I discovered, in which the most violent and bloody killings were carried out by men who then organized ceasefires for race meetings and market days. It was a war during which women were targeted, tarred and feathered, stripped and raped and daubed with red and blue paint and sometimes murdered for associating with members of the Crown forces. It was a place where innocent men were dragged out of bed by members of an occupying army and shot dead “while trying to escape.” It was a war fought by damaged men fresh from the slaughterhouse of the Great War unleashed at a pound a day upon the people of Ireland. It was a war fought by brave, idealistic, articulate and intelligent men on both sides; men who hated war fighting and policing alongside other men who weren’t living unless they were killing.

Plumbing this, prodding the underbelly, searching for the details of what being alive was like during this period of bloody tumult. This, really, is what Peeler is about.

(A version of this essay appeared originally in Crime Always Pays.)